生态环境技术调查官制度的问题检视与规则构建  

Problem Review and Rule Construction of Ecological and Environmental Technology Investigator System

作　　者：张李进 贾爱玲[1] ZHANG Li-jin;JIA Ai-ling(Zhejiang A&F University,Hangzhou 311300,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学文法学院,浙江杭州311300

出　　处：《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2025年第1期63-70,共8页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering

基　　金：浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目“生态环境损害‘行民刑’责任一体的司法实践与规则构建”(2023GH056)。

摘　　要：鉴于生态环境类案件日渐复杂且具有较强技术性和专业性,引入生态环境技术调查官制度以应对生态环境案件的审理困境具有迫切性与正当性。实践中,我国生态环境技术调查官制度存在选任标准不够完善、技术调查报告公开及效力不明确和技术调查官的工作规则不够细致等问题。基于价值共通性,我国知识产权技术调查官制度可为生态环境技术调查官制度提供经验借鉴。为推进其适用,在规则设计上,应细化生态环境技术调查官选任标准,并明晰调查报告为审判的辅助技术参考;程序上应健全工作职责与监督管理规则,以确保该制度的良性运作。In view of the increasingly complex and highly technical and professional ecological environmental cases,it is urgent and legitimate to introduce the system of ecological environmental technical investigators to deal with the trial difficulties of ecological environmental cases.In practice,there are some problems in the system of eco-environmental technical investigators in China,such as the lack of perfect selection standards,the openness and effectiveness of technical investigation reports,and the lack of detailed working rules of technical investigators.Based on the commonality of value,China’s intellectual property technology investigator system can provide experience for the ecological environment technology investigator system.In order to promote its application,in the design of the rules,the selection criteria of ecological environmental technology investigators should be detailed,and the investigation report should be clarified as the reference of auxiliary technology for trial.Procedures should be improved job responsibilities and supervision management rules to ensure the good operation of the system.

关 键 词：生态环境 技术调查官 选任标准 生态环境技术调查报告 诉讼价值 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]