独任制在民事普通程序中的适用研究  

On the Application of the Sole-Judge Trial in Ordinary Civil Procedures

作　　者：程若瑜 Cheng Ruoyu(School of Law,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471000)

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学法学院,洛阳471000

出　　处：《西部学刊》2025年第2期107-110,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：2021年修订的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的一个显著变化是扩大了独任审判的适用范围,修订后,独任制与简易程序不再“简单捆绑”,一审普通程序独任制只适用于基层法院,扩大了独任制的适用范围。这一变化,符合法院对诉讼效率的追求和保障当事人程序利益的要求,也顺应了域外法的发展趋势。其主要障碍在于与“合议为主、独任为辅”的一审原则相违背和可能存在操作障碍。完善建议:(一)通过正反面清单明确普通程序独任制的适用标准;(二)限制普通程序独任制的不当简化;(三)完善独任制扩张配套机制。A notable change in the 2021 revision of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China is the expansion of the scope of application for sole-judge trials.After the revision,the sole-judge trials are no longer“simply bundled”with summary procedures.Sole-judge trials in first-instance ordinary procedures are only applicable to grassroots courts,thereby broadening the scope of their application.This change aligns with the courts’pursuit of litigation efficiency and the requirement to safeguard the procedural interests of the parties involved.It also conforms to the developmental trends in foreign legal systems.The main obstacles lie in the violation of the first-instance principle of“dominating collegial trials with compensating sole-judge trials”,and potential operational difficulties.Improvement suggestions include:(1)Clarifying the criteria for the application of the sole-judge trials in ordinary procedures through positive and negative lists;(2)Limiting the improper simplification of the sole-judge trials in ordinary procedures;(3)Perfecting the supporting mechanisms for the expansion of the sole-judge trials.

关 键 词：独任制扩张 独任审理 普通程序 程序保障 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]