被遮蔽的生物保守主义——从海德格尔的技术哲学研究入手  

The concealed bio-conservatism:a study starting from Heidegger’s philosophy of technology

作　　者：白倍铭 BAI Beiming(School of Philosophy,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710062,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学学院,陕西西安710062

出　　处：《中国医学伦理学》2025年第1期8-14,共7页Chinese Medical Ethics

摘　　要：生物技术的发展使得医疗不再局限于一般意义上对身心机能的“恢复”,而是越来越多地涉及“增强”。由此也带来了激烈的伦理争议,表现为对技术与生命、人性等诸多问题的深层次思考。反对者站在人文关怀的立场上持保守态度,认为增强技术的发展与使用会使得人类社会乃至人作为人都受到严重的威胁。然而,纵观其反对理由,会发现其中多处隐含着对健康恒定、人性静止等前提的预设。这不仅会使其批评难以完整地切中要害,成为“颠倒”的技术决定论者,也体现了更本源意义上对人与技术关系的误置,陷入了海德格尔所描述的、作为解蔽的技术之遮蔽当中。The development of biotechnology has made healthcare no longer limited to the general“restoration”of physical and mental functions,but increasingly involves“enhancement.”This has also sparked intense ethical controversies,manifested in deeper thinking about technology and life,human nature,and many other issues.Opponents hold a conservative attitude from the standpoint of humanistic care,believing that the development and use of enhancement technologies pose a serious threat to human society and even human beings.However,looking at their reasons for opposition,many implicit assumptions about the premise of constant health and the stillness of human nature can be found.This not only makes it difficult for their criticism to fully hit the nail on the head,turning them into“inverted”technological determinists,but also reflects a more fundamental misplacement of the relationship between humans and technology,falling into the concealment that Heidegger described as a means of technological unveiling.

关 键 词：生物保守主义 人类增强 生物技术 遮蔽 技术决定论 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]