检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宇晨 翁梦娟 ZHANG Yuchen;WENG Mengjuan(Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038;Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术信息研究所,北京100038 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《中国科技资源导刊》2024年第6期65-77,共13页China Science & Technology Resources Review
基 金:中国科学技术信息研究所重点工作项目“智能情报融合创新体系建设研究与应用”(ZD2023-11)。
摘 要:增长是企业问题的原点。当外部环境增速放缓时,企业应更加关注内部的增长能力。基于我国西部欠发达地区的287家上市企业的相关数据,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法,整合产业特征、模式创新、运营能力层面的6个条件,探索企业高增长能力的驱动模式。研究表明:提升需求潜力、战略变革和运营效率成为推动我国欠发达地区上市企业高增长能力的核心动力,而创新赋能、优质资源是助力企业高增长能力的辅助力量,3个核心条件组合形成了3条正向互补的等效路径(H1、H3、H4);有些企业仅通过较强的产业特征作为核心动力,替代非高的优质资源,单独驱动企业实现增长,形成了1条替代型的等效路径(H2)。根据组态特征,H1、H2、H3、H4分别命名为“传统高效型”“顺应时代型”“高效变革型”“优质研发型”。非高增长企业的驱动机制与高增长企业的驱动机制存在非对称性关系。研究结果为欠发达地区企业研究提供新思路,为寻找企业增长能力路径提供新视角。Growth is the origin of business problems.When external conditions stagnate,companies must prioritize their internal growth potential.Based on the data of 287 listed Chinese enterprises in underdeveloped western regions,we use the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)method to integrate six conditions at the level of industrial characteristics,model innovation,and operational capacity to explore the driving mode of high growth capacity of enterprises.The study shows that:Enhancement of demand potential,strategic change and operational efficiency become the core driving force to promote the highgrowth capacity of listed enterprises in underdeveloped regions of China,while innovation empowerment and quality resources are the auxiliary forces to help the high-growth capacity of enterprises,and the combination of the three core conditions forms three positive and complementary paths of equivalence(H1,H3,H4).Notably,some companies have formed an alternative equivalent path(H2)by replacing non-high-quality resources with stronger industrial characteristics as the core driving force to achieve growth alone.Based on these configurations,H1,H2,H3 and H4 are named as‘traditional and efficient’,‘adaptive’,‘efficient and transformational’and‘quality R&D’respectively.High-quality R&D type’.There is an asymmetric relationship between the driving mechanisms of non-high-growth firms and those of high-growth firms.The results of the study provide new ideas for the study of enterprises in underdeveloped regions and new perspectives for finding the path of enterprise growth capacity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43