理论和生活:钱大昕与焦循“七出”问题论争的两面性  

Theory and Life:The Duality of Qian Daxin and Jiao Xun′s Dispute on"Qichu"Issue

作　　者：戚林聪 赵厚均[1] QI Lincong;ZHAO Houjun(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海200241

出　　处：《江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期40-46,共7页Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“古代文论研究文献辑录、学术史考察及数据库建设(1911—1949)”(18ZDA242)。

摘　　要：钱大昕支持“七出”出妻原则,认为不必拘于从一而终的贞节观;焦循则在《翼钱》上篇借用《周易》的思想反对钱大昕。从理论上看,钱大昕本于礼学而焦循本于易学,钱大昕更加通达而焦循显得迂腐;但从两人的情感生活方面考察,则能发现焦循的观念亦有足够丰富的生活经验作支撑,而非固守教条。因此兼顾理论和生活两个角度,方能完整看待这一争论。Qian Daxin approves the principle of"Qichu",arguing that the chastity concept need not to be held rigidly.Whereas Jiao xun quotes The Book of Changes to oppose Qian Daxin in the first chapter of Yi Qian.In theory,Qian Daxin bases his ideas on the study of etiquette,while Jiao Xun′s notions originate from the study of Yi.It seems that Qian Daxin is more open-minded while Jiao Xun is more pedantic.But from the perspective of their emotional lives,it can be found that Jiao Xun′s ideas are supported by touching life experiences instead of rigid dogma as well.Therefore,only by balancing both theoretical and practical perspectives,can we take a comprehensive view of this dispute.

关 键 词：焦循 钱大昕 “七出” 《翼钱》 《答问》 

分 类 号：K249.3[历史地理—历史学]