检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龙海涛 何朋 LONG Haitao;HE Peng(PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited,Chengdu,Sichuan 610072)
机构地区:[1]中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川成都610072
出 处:《四川水力发电》2024年第6期76-79,100,共5页Sichuan Hydropower
摘 要:随着电力及其它基础设施行业的EPC市场竞争日益激烈,电力设计企业为了增强综合实力,往往依托设计引领的核心优势,作为牵头单位与施工企业组建联营体参与市场竞争。但是,不同的市场前端背景及项目获取方式,也使得设计企业呈现不同的项目管理特点和履约风险。文章从管理标准化角度出发,基于不同的市场环境,研究总结了设计企业牵头的三种不同类型的EPC联营体管理模式,对设计企业实施总承包管理具有重要的指导意义。With the increasingly fierce competition in the EPC market of power and other infrastructure industries,in order to enhance the comprehensive strength,power design enterprises often rely on the core advantages of design and constitute joint ventures with construction enterprises to participate in market competition.However,different market background and project acquisition methods also make design enterprises present different project management characteristics and performance risks.From the perspective of management standardization,based on different market environments,this paper studies and summarizes three different types of EPC joint venture management models led by design enterprises,which have important guiding significance for design enterprises to implement general contracting management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.222.110