行政审判司法建议的功能研究  

Research on Function of Administrative Trial Judicial Suggestions

作　　者：杨红 邓喆 YANG Hong;DENG Zhe(School of Law,Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou 730070,China)

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法大学法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期79-87,共9页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：甘肃省民族法制文化研究所2024年度研究课题“行政审判中司法建议功能的研究”(GSFYSKT 2024-19)。

摘　　要：在行政法创新发展背景下,司法建议在促使行政争议实质性化解方面具有重要的功能。通过对行政审判中司法建议具体样态的分析,发现各方主体对司法建议的期待不同,司法建议功能的扩充趋势明显。在司法建议适用的表象中,反映出当前司法建议适用的理论和现实困扰,即司法建议负荷过重、司法建议实效不彰、行政相对人权利救济保障不足等问题。对此,我国应规范司法建议的运用、增加司法建议的发送范围和内容、完善司法建议的监督与回应机制,以优化行政审判司法建议的功能,助力行政争议的实质性化解。Under the background of the innovation and development of administrative law,judicial suggestions play an important role in promoting the substantive resolution of administrative disputes.Through the analysis of the specific forms of judicial suggestions in administrative trials,it is found that the parties have different expectations for judicial suggestions,and the trend of the expansion of judicial suggestions is obvious.In the appearance of the application of judicial suggestions,it reflects the current theoretical and practical troubles of the application of judicial suggestions,that is,the judicial suggestions are overloaded,the effectiveness of the judicial suggestions is not clear,and the administrative counterpart’s right relief is insufficient.Therefore,in terms of optimizing the function of judicial suggestions in administrative trials,we can standardize the application of judicial suggestions,increase the scope and content of judicial suggestions,and improve the supervision and response mechanism of judicial suggestions.

关 键 词：行政审判 司法建议 功能 优化 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]