十九世纪中日教育现代化思想比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Thoughts of Educational Modernization in China and Japan in the 19th Century

作　　者：张一伟 Zhang Yiwei(School of History,Culture and Tourism,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252000)

机构地区：[1]聊城大学历史文化与旅游学院,聊城252000

出　　处：《西部学刊》2025年第1期91-94,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：在十九世纪的东亚,面对西方文明的强势输入,中国和日本均提出了借助东方儒家文化推动近代教育现代化转型的指导思想。虽然“中体西用”和“和魂洋才”均将儒家思想视作缓解西方文化冲击,避免文化体系丧失主导权的有力手段,但是近代日本所提出的“和魂洋才”相较于中国的“中体西用”更具有包容性,将培养具有独立思想的国民、建立现代化的教育体系视为近代日本教育现代化转型的目标,而“中体西用”思想则将近代中国的教育现代化转型限制在应用实践中,丝毫没有动摇近代中国封建制度的根本。这导致近代中日两国教育现代化转型的结果迥然不同,限制了近代中国现代化建设的发展。In East Asia in the 19th century,in the face of the powerful influx of Western civilization,both China and Japan put forward the guiding ideology of promoting the modern educational modernization transformation with the help of Oriental Confucianism culture.Although both the idea of“Zhong Ti Xi Yong(Chinese learning as the fundamental structure and Western learning for practical use)”in China and the concept of“Hehun Yangcai(Japanese spirit with Western knowledge)”in Japan regarded Confucianism as a powerful means to mitigate the impact of Western culture and to avoid the loss of dominance of the cultural system,the“Hehun Yangcai”proposed by modern Japan was more inclusive compared with the“Zhong Ti Xi Yong”in China,and regarded cultivating citizens with independent thinking and establishing a modern education system as the goals of the educational modernization transformation in modern Japan,while the idea of“Zhong Ti Xi Yong”limited the educational modernization transformation in modern China to the application of practice,without shaking the fundamentals of the feudal system in modern China at all.This led to completely different results in the educational modernization transformation in modern China and Japan,and restricted the development of modernization construction in modern China.

关 键 词：“中体西用” “和魂洋才” 中日教育现代化思想 

分 类 号：G52[文化科学—教育学] G53[文化科学—教育技术学] G57