中药假药认定:生产、销售、提供假药罪的司法样态及其难题破解  

The Identification of TCM Counterfeit Drugs:the Judicial Pattern of the Crime of Producing,Selling,or Providing Counterfeit Drugs and the Solution

作　　者：曹兴华 吕婉婧 赵亮 CAO Xinghua;LÜWanjing;ZHAO Liang(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100092,China;Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 610050,China;Xingwen County People's Procuratorate of Sichuan Province,Yibin,Sichuan 644499,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100092 [2]厦门大学,福建厦门610050 [3]四川省兴文县人民检察院,四川宜宾644499

出　　处：《医学与法学》2025年第1期64-70,共7页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基金项目“刑罚执行视域下新矫治刑罚理论的内在理路与实现机制研究”(项目编号:21YJC820003)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近年来在药品犯罪的司法适用中,关涉中药假药认定的争议日益激烈。通过统计分析司法实务中生产、销售、提供假药罪的中药假药认定问题,发现该罪中对中药假药的认定存在基点偏差、论证缺失、标准阙如和程序依附四个难题。为破解上述难题,应当做到:一是树立中药假药现实危险性的实质评价观念;二是确立中药假药认定的裁判逻辑及证据要素;三是在特别法中规定中药假药认定的标准;四是在技术审查和司法鉴定程序中细分增设中药领域类型。In the judicial application of drug-related crimes,the controversy surrounding the identification of TCM counterfeit drugs has intensified in recent years.Through the statistical analysis of judicial cases involving the crime of producing,selling,or providing counterfeit drugs,four major issues have been identified in the recognition of TCM counterfeit drugs:deviation of base point,lack of demonstration,absence of standard and reliance on procedure.To solve the above-mentioned problems,four key measures should be implemented:establishing a substantive evaluation perspective on the actual risks posed by TCM counterfeit drugs,developing a logical framework and evidentiary criteria for the identification of TCM counterfeit drugs,specifying dedicated standards for the identification of TCM counterfeit drugs in special laws,and introducing specialized categories for TCM in technical review and judicial appraisal procedures.

关 键 词：生产、销售、提供假药罪 法益 中药 假药 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生] D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]