万物元一又归一——以滕尼斯、海德格尔与斯洛特戴克的共同体思考为线索  

Out of the Primordial Unity and Back into It

作　　者：叶瑶 Ye Yao

机构地区：[1]复旦大学外国语言文学学院

出　　处：《哲学门》2024年第2期285-303,共19页Beida Journal of Philosophy

摘　　要：本文借“万物元一又归一”这一短语,试图思考一个社会或共同体如何保持为整体之“一”,以及作为“多”的个体如何源出于集体,又必复归于集体的问题。这种思考又以比较德国社会学家斐迪南·滕尼斯、哲学家马丁·海德格尔与彼得·斯洛特戴克关于共同体问题的论述为线索,其中主要考察滕尼斯关于共同体与社会之对立以及两者同源于人之结合意志的论证,考察海德格尔就此在在基础生存论层面上的共在结构所展开的现象学分析以及“在世中”之沉沦与本真的纠缠关系,考察斯洛特戴克围绕着自创的“球域”概念重新解释人类群体的形成、延续与演变问题。Under the inspiration of the phrase“Out of the Primordial Unity and Back into It”this article attempts to reflect on the way how a society or community remains as the Oneness in whole and how multiple individuals originate from it and unite with it.This reflection is based on the comparison between the argumentations which the German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies,the German philosopher Martin Heidegger and Peter Sloterdijk have offered on the issue of community.Tönnies sees an opposition between community and society and argues yet that they can be traced back to the same human will to union.Heidegger offers a phenomenological analysis of the coexistence structure to which the Dasein is bounded fundamentally as well as an explanation about the entanglement between the inauthenticity and authenticity of“Being-in-the-world”.Lastly it tends to examine the concept“Sphere”which is reinterpreted by Sloterdijk aiming to show how human groups come to form,remain existing and evolve.

关 键 词：万物元一 共同体 滕尼斯 海德格尔 斯洛特戴克 

分 类 号：B086[哲学宗教—哲学理论]