哲学社会科学实验室的“新文科转向”:轨迹、视野与进路  

The“new humanities turn”in the laboratory of philosophy and social sciences:Trajectories,perspectives,and approaches

作　　者：唐斌[1] 朱德宸 于慧敏 TANG Bin;ZHU Dechen;YU Huimin(Key Laboratory of Urban and Rural Public Security&Digital Governance,School of Public Administration,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510642,China)

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学公共管理学院城乡公共安全与数智治理重点实验室,广东广州510642

出　　处：《实验技术与管理》2025年第1期265-272,共8页Experimental Technology and Management

基　　金：2024年广东省研究生教育创新计划项目(2024ANLK_013);华南农业大学高水平大学科研创新项目(A693-2024)。

摘　　要：哲学社会科学实验室是新文科建设的重要载体。我国哲学社会科学实验室建设已经从单一学科探索转向学科交叉融合、从传统文本分析转向人工智能研究的双向调试阶段。该文在梳理我国哲学社会科学实验室发展现状、功能定位、运作模式、机遇挑战的基础上,总结出国际视野下实验室项目化数据在生产、多样化输出结果、构建集群技术结构等发展趋势,揭示本土视野下实验室发展从技术的移接孵化到情景再造的发展转向,提出以数增“智”、差异化情境共享、学科交叉融合增长等进路展望。[Objective]In the context of new liberal arts,the importance of cross-fertilization between natural and social sciences has become increasingly evident.As pivotal platforms for fostering this integration,China’s philosophy and social science laboratories are evolving from single-discipline research toward interdisciplinary integration.These laboratories are transitioning from traditional text-based analyses to methodologies that incorporate artificial intelligence.However,despite this progress,many of these laboratories still operate under frameworks designed for the natural sciences and have yet to establish a genuinely transdisciplinary discourse system for the posthumanist era.Current academic research predominantly addresses the macro-level challenges associated with the construction of liberal arts laboratories.The proposed solutions often lack empirical validation or theoretical insights from practical experience Additionally,much of the focus remains on integrating social sciences with high-tech natural science disciplines,while other practice-oriented fields,such as the new agricultural or medical sciences,are largely overlooked in cross-disciplinary efforts.This study examines the developmental bottlenecks facing Chinese philosophy and social science laboratories,and gaps in both theoretical and practical application.This study examines the historical evolution and functional positioning of social science laboratories from international and domestic perspectives.By leveraging a practical integration model of“Agronomy+Social Science+Mathematical Intelligence,”the study proposes pathways for advancing the development of Chinese philosophy and social science laboratories.[Methods]This study primarily utilizes a literature review and comparative analysis methodology to distill the experiences and best practices of leading international universities in the construction of social science laboratories.The research draws on an extensive range of resources,including literature from Google Scholar,CNKI,data

关 键 词：高校 哲学社会科学 实验室 新文科 新农科 

分 类 号：G434[文化科学—教育学]