检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵鑫[1] 杨梅柳 郝晓慧 魏天雄 张琪 常浩宇 武秀霞 Zhao Xin;Yang Mei-Liu;Hao Xiao-Hui;Wei Tian-Xiong;Zhang Qi;Chang Hao-Yu;Wu Xiu-Xia(Department of Radiotherapy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 075000,China;Department of Biology,Hengshui University,Hengshui,Hebei 053000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北北方学院附属第一医院放疗科,河北张家口075000 [2]衡水学院生命科学学院,河北衡水053000
出 处:《解放军医学杂志》2025年第1期44-49,共6页Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:河北省医学科学研究课题计划项目(20241010)。
摘 要:目的评价剂量表面积直方图(DSH)对前列腺癌(PCa)患者急性放射性直肠炎(RP)的预测价值。方法本研究为前瞻性随机对照临床研究。收集2018年1月-2023年1月河北北方学院附属第一医院放疗科收治的380例PCa患者,采用抽签法随机分为观察组(n=200)与对照组(n=180)。采用DSH评价观察组直肠剂量分布,剂量体积直方图(DVH)评价对照组直肠剂量分布。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评价两种计划评价工具对急性RP的预测效能。结果两组年龄、RPS评分、体重指数(BMI)等临床资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组急性RP级别比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组S_(40)与V_(40)、S_(50)与V_(50)、S_(60)与V_(60)、S_(70)与V_(70)、S_(78)与V_(78)比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。S_(40)、S_(50)、V_(40)、V_(50)预测各级急性RP的曲线下面积(AUC)≤0.700,提示低等效能(P<0.001),S_(60)、V_(60)预测各级急性RP的AUC为0.700~0.900,提示中等效能(P<0.001),S_(70)、S_(78)、V_(70)、V_(78)预测各级急性RP的AUC>0.900,提示高等效能(P<0.001)。结论DSH对PCa患者直肠毒性的预测效能与DVH较为相似,在未来放射治疗计划设计中可弥补DVH的不足或单独用于计划评价。Objective To evaluate the predictive value of dose-surface histogram(DSH)for radiation proctitis(RP)in prostate cancer(PCa)patients undergoing radiotherapy.Methods This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included 380 PCa patients who underwent image-guided radiotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Northern University from January 2018 to January 2023.Patients were randomly divided into observation group(n=200)and control group(n=180).The rectal dose distribution of patients in the two groups was evaluated by using DSH and dose-volume histogram(DVH),respectively.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was utilized to evaluate the predictive value of DSH for acute RP,with DVH serving as a reference.Results The difference was not statistically significant in clinical information such as age,KPS score,and body mass index(BMI)between the observation and control groups(P>0.05),as well as in acute RP incidence(P>0.05).There were significant differences in S_(40)and V_(40),S_(50)and V_(50),S_(60)and V_(60),S_(70)and V_(70),and S_(78)and V_(78)between the two groups(P<0.05).S_(40),S_(50),V_(40),and V_(50)showed low efficacy(P<0.001)in predicting acute RP at each level,with AUC≤0.700.S_(60)and V_(60)showed moderate efficacy(P<0.001)in predicting acute RP at each level,with AUC 0.700-0.900.S_(70),S_(78),V_(70)and V_(78)showed high efficacy(P<0.001)in predicting acute RP at each level,with AUC>0.900.Conclusions The predictive value of DSH for rectal toxicity in patients with PCa is basically consistent with that of DVH.It is expected to become a novel and valuable tool for evaluating radiotherapy plans in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166