检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周达 李河霖 ZHOU Da;LI Helin(Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出 处:《比较教育学报》2025年第1期160-176,共17页Journal of Comparative Education
基 金:国家社会科学基金教育学青年项目“教育数字化背景下创造性思维的在线测评与培养策略转化研究”(项目编号:CHA230309)。
摘 要:创造力作为创新人才应具备的基本能力之一,已得到教育研究者的广泛关注。然而,大多数研究者更关注一般性创造力的评价与培养研究,对如何以学科为载体,落实创造力评价与培养的相关研究仍有待加强。基于此,本研究采用系统性文献综述的方法,选取2013-2023年国内外核心期刊文章,以数学学科为载体,围绕数学创造力的内涵、评价、培养三个方面进行综述。研究结果表明:数学创造力的概念内涵应从一元论观点拓展到多元论观点;数学创造力的评价指标体系应增加“推理深度”这一维度;面向数字化手段的数学创造力评价方式与工具应得到重视;跨学科融合与技术整合应成为当前数学创造力培养的重要手段。creativity,as one of the basic abilities that innovative talents should possess,has received widespread attention from educational researchers.However,most researchers pay more attention to the evaluation and cultivation of creativity in general,and the relevant research on how to implement the evaluation and cultivation of creativity with disciplines as the carrier needs to be strengthened.Based on this,this study uses the method of systematic literature review,selects key journal articles from 2013 to 2023,and takes mathematics as the carrier to review the definition,evaluation and cultivation of mathematical creativity.The results show that:the definition of mathematical creativity needs to be enriched from the monistic perspective to the pluralistic perspective;the evaluation index system of mathematical creativity should add the dimension of"depth of reasoning",and at the same time,the evaluation methods and tools of mathematical creativity oriented to digital means should be paid more attention to;strategies for cultivating mathematical creativity under interdisciplinary integration and technology integration should be constructed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7