“文道关系”的审美生成论——一个伟大传统的再认识  

Reinterpretation of the Aesthetic Generation Theory of the“Relationship Between Literature and Dao”

作　　者：刘锋杰 Liu Fengjie

机构地区：[1]浙江越秀外国语学院 [2]苏州大学文学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2025年第1期36-46,255,共12页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“‘文以载道’观的发生、嬗变与当代价值研究”(项目号:18AZW001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：现代文论主流建构了文道关系的对立图景,将其视为反审美的功利化命题。其实,返回文道关系的发生现场与发展过程看,它的生成具有审美性。从“文礼论”的“节文”转向“立文”,代表了它的审美发端;而齐梁、唐宋时期建构“文道论”的成熟形态,代表了它的审美生成;即使在明清以后出现了“文情论”,看似与“文道论”相对立,其间亦可兼容,代表了它的审美持存。正确认识“文道关系”必须确认道是事物的本原与规律且不断涌现,而文正是把握这种规律与涌现的审美召唤方式,这样才能深入理解文道关系的内生性。The mainstream of modern literary theory constructs an opposing image of the relationship between literature and Dao,viewing it as a pragmatic proposition against aesthetics.However,its aesthetic nature could be discerned by an re-examination on its emergence and development.The shift from the“regulated expression”in the“Literature and Ritual Theory”to“literary establishment”signifies its aesthetic origin;the mature form of“Literature and Dao Theory”illustrates its aesthetic generation;and the“Literature and Emotion Theory”represents its aesthetic persistence.A proper understanding of the“relationship between Literature and Dao”must acknowledge that Dao stands as the origin and principle of things that continually emerges,while literature serves as the aesthetic mode of grasping this principle and emergence,therefore allowing for a deeper comprehension of the inherent nature of their relationship.

关 键 词：文道关系 审美生成 从道 能文 内生性 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]