论执行和解协议可诉之有限性  

On the Limitation of Litigability of Enforcing Settlement Agreement

作　　者：苏圣斌 唐东楚[1] Su Shengbin;Tang Dongchu(School of Law,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,长沙410083

出　　处：《天津法学》2024年第3期68-76,共9页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：执行和解协议可诉性“非有即无”式的论争根本问题在于他们都忽视了其可诉之有限性,这种“有限性”具体表现在有限的类型、有限的基础、有限的审查等。对执行和解协议可诉性的完善必须着眼并坚持其“有限性”:对履行期限与变更次数予以限制,对该类案件的起诉因为不属于“初始纠纷”而不适用立案登记制,对非经审判程序直接赋予执行和解协议以执行力的做法予以禁止。如此方能真正地“案结事了”,从而实现私权自治与公权审查的平衡,并且不违背“审执分立”的法理与改革方向。The fundamental problem with the"all-or-nothing"debate on the litigability of enforcing settlement agreement is that they have ignored the limited litigability.This"limitation"is embodied in limited types,limited foundations,and limited review.The improvement of the litigability of enforcing settlement agreement must focus and insist on its“limitation”:Limit the performance period and the number of changes,the prosecution of this type of case does not apply to the registration system because it is not an“initial dispute”,it is forbidden to directly endow the enforcement of settlement agreement with enforcement power without trial procedures.Only in this way can the case be truly“closed”so as to achieve a balance between the autonomy of private rights and the review of public rights and does not violate the legal principle and reform direction of“separation of trial and enforcement”.

关 键 词：执行和解协议 可诉之有限性 有限类型 有限基础 有限审查 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]