对西方整体主义环境伦理学论证逻辑的再审视——兼与裴士军、徐朝旭老师商榷  

Further Reflection on the Argumentation Logics of Western Holistic Environmental Ethics--A Discussion with Mr.Pei Shijun and Mr.Xu Zhaoxu

作　　者：李秀艳 Li Xiuyan

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《理论界》2024年第12期46-52,共7页Theory Horizon

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“党的十八大以来我国生态文明建设对人类文明发展的贡献研究”(22ZDA105);天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目“习近平生态文明思想的内在逻辑研究”(TJKS19XSX-011)的研究成果。

摘　　要：在本体论层面,西方整体主义环境伦理学的代表人物克里考特和罗尔斯顿对自然内在价值的论证逻辑是不同的。但在认识论和实践论层面,二者都注重情感的作用,遵循了“情感→价值→义务”的论证逻辑。然而,情感具有主观性,难免导致道德相对主义问题。为此,我们要将人理解为一个有机的生命整体,避免将人视为单向度的理性存在或单向度的情感存在。既要促进人类科学理性不断进步,又要加强人与自然的情感联系,高扬人的道德理性,在实现人的内在价值的同时,实现自然的内在价值。At the ontological level,the representative figures of western holistic environmental ethics,J.B.Callicott and Holmes Rolston,have different argumentation logics for the intrinsic value of nature.However,at the epistemological and practical levels,both of them focus on the role of sympathy and follow the argumentation logic of"sympathy→value→obligation".But the subjectivity of sympathy inevitably leads to the problem of moral relativism.Therefore,we should understand human beings as an organic whole of life and avoid treating them as one-dimensional rational or emotional existences.It is necessary to promote continuous progress in human scientific rationality while also strengthening the emotional connection between human beings and nature and exalting human moral rationality.By realizing the intrinsic value of human beings,we can also realize the intrinsic value of nature.

关 键 词：论证逻辑 自然的内在价值 克里考特 罗尔斯顿 情感 

分 类 号：B1[哲学宗教—世界哲学]