瑕不掩瑜:沈钦韩注王安石诗文始末  

The Errors Does Not Overshadow the Advantages:The Process of Shen Qinhan’s Annotating of Wang Anshi’s Poems

作　　者：伏虹晓 FU Hongxiao(School of Chinese language and literature,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310030)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院,浙江杭州310030

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2025年第1期91-97,90,共8页Research of Chinese Literature

摘　　要：沈钦韩作为吴派后劲,注书颇丰,其《王荆公诗文沈氏注》更是清代研究王安石诗文的代表之作。《幼学堂尺牍》记录了他笺注过程中的丰富细节,不仅能还原沈钦韩的撰写时间和过程,亦能窥探沈氏作为嘉道学者的困境与特点。为了对抗清代公羊学派,也出于对王安石及其诗歌注者李壁都“不太赞成的态度”,沈钦韩历时一年半完成了注解荆公诗文的工作。虽然沈钦韩囿于随借随抄的方式,产生了一些讹误,但他在考证王安石行实及诗文系年等方面仍做出了重要贡献。Shen Qinhan,as a late supporter of the Wu School,wrote a lot of notes,and his Notes on the Poems of Wang Jing⁃gong is the representative work on the study of Wang Anshi’s poetry and prose in the Qing Dynasty.The Letters of Shen Qinhan contains abundant details in the process of his annotating,which can not only restore the time and process of Shen Qinhan’s writing,but also probe into Shen’s predicament and characteristics as a scholar living in the period of Jia-Dao.In order to counter the Gong⁃yang School in the Qing Dynasty,Shen Qinhan spent one and a half years annotating Jing Gong’s poems out of his“unfavorable atti⁃tude”towards Wang Anshi and his poetic commentator Li Bi.Although Shen Qinhan made some mistakes due to the way of annotat⁃ing,he still made important contributions in the research of Wang Anshi’s life and poetry.

关 键 词：沈钦韩 王安石 《幼学堂尺牍》 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]