“克己复礼”诠释聚讼及其消解之道  

The Annotation and Controversy of"Self restraint and Restoration of Rites"in the Analects

作　　者：唐青州 Tang Qingzhou

机构地区：[1]中共上海市委党校哲学教研部

出　　处：《理论界》2025年第1期83-89,共7页Theory Horizon

基　　金：2021年上海市社科规划年度课题“习近平总书记关于共产党人‘心学’系列论述的学理阐释”(2021ZKS005);2024年上海市社科规划专项课题“破解‘古今中西之争’的时代逻辑与上海实践研究”(2024VSJ055)的研究成果。

摘　　要：作为儒家思想的核心命题,《论语》“克己复礼”一章的诠释聚讼历经千年而经久不息,贯穿了整个孔颜之学工夫论研究的始终,同时也折射出儒者们不同的哲学立场和工夫取向。本文在回顾“克己复礼”诠释争议的基础上,从制度与精神两个层面切入考察“礼”的精神性意涵,在对“礼”本身的精神性意涵进行再探讨和对“礼”的道德内涵进行再挖掘的基础上,进一步反思和回应近代杜维明与何炳棣二人关于“克己复礼”的诠释争论。As the core proposition of Confucianism,the interpretation of the chapter"Self-restraint and Restoration of Rites"in the Analects has been a subject of debate.for millennia,running through the entire study of Confucianism's theory of kung fu and reflecting the diverse philosophical positions and kung fu orientations of Confucian scholars.On the basis of reviewing the controversy over the interpretation of"self-restraint and restoration of ritual",this article examines the spiritual connotations of"ritual"from the perspectives of system and spirit.Through a deeper exploration of the spiritual meaning of ritual itself and excavation of the moral connotation of ritual,the article fur-ther reflects on and responds the interpretation debate of"self-restraint and restoration of ritual"between Du Weiming and He Bingdi in modem timee.

关 键 词：克己复礼 诠释 争议 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]