检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕平[1,2] 秦如月 Lyu Ping;Qin Ruyue(the School of International Relations at Dalian University of Foreign Languages;the Northeast Asia Research Institute at Dalian University of Foreign Languages;Country and Regional Studies at the School of International Relations,Dalian University of Foreign Languages)
机构地区:[1]大连外国语大学国际关系学院 [2]大连外国语大学东北亚研究院
出 处:《当代韩国》2024年第4期53-68,共16页Contemporary Korea
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“冷战后东北亚海洋领土争端的危机管控机制研究”(项目编号:20YJCGJW007)成果。
摘 要:拜登执政后美国外交路线转向“中间主义”。日韩作为抑制中国崛起的前线国家,须向美国输送资源,也要承担美国转嫁的维持体系边界稳定的成本。提升与日韩的合作水平成为拜登政府实现“中间主义”的着力点。本文首先介绍了美国自拜登执政后转向“中间主义”外交的背景与内核,然后从外交、军事、经贸三个层面概述了美国引导下美日韩三国合作升级的具体表现。第三部分剖析了美国转向“中间主义”外交的内涵逻辑,认为“中间主义”的目标是实现“有为”与“克制”下的“低成本护持”,其根本内涵是立足国内,由内生动力再次挽救美国的衰颓之势。Since Biden took office,US foreign policy has shifted towards“Intermediatism”.Japan and ROK,as frontline states to contain China's rise and peripheral states of the US hegemonic system,are obliged to supply resources to the US and to cover the costs of maintaining the stability of the system's boundaries shifted by the US.Enhancing cooperation with Japan and ROK has become a focal point for the Biden administration to implement“Intermediatism”.This paper first introduces the background and core of the US shift towards“Intermediatism”diplomacy since Biden took office,then outlines the specific manifestations of the US-led trilateral cooperation between the US,Japan,and ROK from the aspects of diplomacy,military,and economy.The third part analyzes the connotation and logic of the US shift towards“Intermediatism”diplomacy,arguing that the goal of“Intermediatism”is to achieve“low-cost maintenance”through the interactive game of“active”and“restrained”.The fundamental connotation is based on domestic factors,with endogenous dynamics once again rescuing the decline of the US.The article concludes by assessing the prospects and providing suggestions for how China should respond.It fills the gap in domestic and international research on US“Intermediatism”diplomacy that lacks practical research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.104.114