检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋颖 Jiang Ying
出 处:《中国社会科学院大学学报》2024年第12期5-22,144,F0003,共20页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
摘 要:科研绩效拨款制度是国家科研评价体系发展的重要驱动力。国家科研评价体系辐射面广、影响力大,在其建设过程中应树立系统观念,对评价体系的基本要素进行精心设计,同时充分认识评价环境和元评价对评价体系建设及评价效果的重要影响,并最终将科学的设计思想反映在评价政策中。目前尚不存在国家科研评价体系“最优”模式,但30余年的国际实践提供了丰富的建设经验,也提出了很多问题和挑战,可为完善我国科研评价体系提供参考和借鉴。The performance-based research funding system(PRFS) is an important driving force for the development of the national research evaluation system.The national research evaluation system has a wide coverage and great influence.In the process of construction,a systematic concept should be established,and the basic elements of the evaluation system should be carefully designed.At the same time,the important impact of the evaluation environment and meta-evaluation on the construction and evaluation effectiveness of the evaluation system should be fully recognized,and the scientific design ideas should be reflected in the evaluation policies.At present,there is no “optimal” model for the national research evaluation system,but the international practice of more than 30 years has provided rich construction experience and also identified many problems and challenges,which can provide reference and inspiration for improving China's research evaluation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7