检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴杰 陈洪昭[1] Wu Jie;Chen Hongzhao(School of Economics,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350117,China)
出 处:《统计与决策》2025年第3期82-87,共6页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(21BJL113);福建省社会科学基金项目(FJ2021B040)。
摘 要:数据要素作为推动数字中国建设的战略资源,评估其发展水平、促进其价值释放具有重要意义。文章基于2013—2022年中国30个省份的面板数据,构建数据要素发展水平评价指标体系,运用熵值法、泰尔指数、莫兰指数等研究方法对中国数据要素发展水平及其时空演变特征进行了测度和分析。研究发现:第一,我国数据要素发展水平持续提升,大致呈现“东强西弱、南强北弱”的格局;第二,中国数据要素发展水平存在较大的区域差异,但总体差异呈缩小趋势,逐渐以各区域内部差异为主;第三,中国数据要素发展水平在空间上具有显著的自相关性,东北、西部地区省份多呈现LL型集聚特征,东中部地区省份则多呈现HH型和LH型集聚特征。As a strategic resource to promote the construction of digital China,it is of great significance to evaluate its development level and promote its value release.Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2013 to 2022,this paper constructs an evaluation index system for the development level of data elements,and uses entropy method,Theil index,Moran’s index and other research methods to measure and analyze the development level of data elements and their spatiotemporal evolution characteristics in China.The findings go as the following:Firstly,the development level of data elements has steadily improved,showing a pattern of“strong in the east and weak in the west,strong in the south and weak in the north”.Secondly,there are great regional differences in the development level of data elements in China,but the overall differences show a decreasing trend,and gradually dominated by differences within the region.Finally,there is notable spatial autocorrelation in digital element development level,with northeastern and western provinces showing LL-type agglomeration and eastern and central provinces showing HH-type and LH-type agglomeration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.218.250