智能医疗责任主体及归责原则法律衡平探讨  

Exploration on the Legal Equity of the Subject of Intelligent Healthcare Responsibility and the Principle of Liability

作　　者：钱亚芳 汪振量 QIAN Yafang;WANG Zhenliang(School of Marxism,Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou 310000,China;Polytechnic Institute,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310000,China)

机构地区：[1]杭州医学院马克思主义学院,浙江杭州310000 [2]浙江大学工程师学院,浙江杭州310000

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2025年第1期21-24,共4页Medicine and Philosophy

基　　金：2017年浙江省社会科学规划后期资助项目(17HQZZ10)。

摘　　要：智能医疗发展方兴未艾,在诊前、诊中、诊后均发挥显著作用。然而医学发展与医疗风险亦如影相随,与其事后亡羊补牢,不如事前未雨绸缪。从目前智能医疗存在的最具争议的焦点问题即智能医疗责任主体和归责原则入手,认为智能医疗责任主体和归责原则并不明确,成为智能医疗有效法律规制的拦路虎。在分析智能医疗责任主体和归责原则的选择依据的前提下,提出了举证责任的合理分配、现有法律的修整衔接、鉴定标准和机构优化等方面的完善建议。The rapid development of intelligent healthcare is profoundly influencing pre-diagnosis,intra-diagnosis,and postdiagnosis stages.However,as medical advancements grow,so do associated risks.Proactive measures are preferable to reactive remedies.Focusing on the most controversial issues in intelligent healthcare:the subject of intelligent healthcare responsibility and the principle of liability,the authors view the ambiguous subject of intelligent healthcare responsibility and the principle of liability as the main obstacles to the effective legal regulation of intelligent healthcare.Based on an analysis of the criteria for selecting the subject of intelligent healthcare liability and the principle of liability,the authors hence propose improvements such as reasonable allocation of the burden of proof,the adjustments and alignment of the existing laws,as well as the optimisation of evaluation standards and institutions.

关 键 词：智能医疗 责任主体 归责原则 法律衡平 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]