司法实践中的校园欺凌:问题与对策  

School Bullying in Judicial Practice:Problems and Countermeasures

作　　者：宋雁慧[1] SONG Yanhui(China Youth University of Political Studies,Beijing 100089)

机构地区：[1]中国青年政治学院青少年工作系,100089

出　　处：《教育科学研究》2025年第1期42-49,共8页Educational Science Research

基　　金：2017年度北京市社会科学基金项目“群体性女生欺凌的过程分析及防治研究”(17JYC028)的成果之一。

摘　　要：经过对现有与校园欺凌相关的151份法院判决文书进行文本分析后,研究发现:在司法实践中往往依据侵权要件来确定是否为校园欺凌案件,即侵权行为发生在当下,双方人数及力量对比差异明显、主观故意强,行为上表现出力量压制性或者手段侮辱性特征,结果上表现为身心或财产损害,且损害结果与欺凌行为具有因果性等。但对于欺凌的长期累积性、隐藏性等特征,法院通常不予考虑,这在一定程度上伤害了司法的底线作用和威慑力。目前,对校园欺凌的司法判定存在三方面的问题:对欺凌界定存在偏差、对欺凌客体的判定片面化、对欺凌的结果处理不当。因此,应当进一步明确校园欺凌的法律界定与识别要件,以“人格权”为核心把握校园欺凌的实质,确立“重民事、轻刑事”的司法规制原则,并强化非民事赔偿手段的救济路径,从而为校园欺凌的治理提供更好的司法保障。From the 151 files in courts,the trial judges decided whether it was bullying accidents according to the elements of infringement,such as the occasion when bulling occurred,the strength contrast of both sides,subjective malice,the insulting behaviors,and the damage in body and mentality,etc.But for the long-term cumulative and hidden characteristics in bullying,the court usually didn't consider,which harmed the bottom line function and deterrence of Law.There are three problems in judicial practice:the definition deviation of bullying,the partial judgment of the object,and the improper handling of the result.So this article put forward that it should be further clarified for the legal definition and identification requirements of bullying,and establish the judicial regulation principle of"emphasizing civil and light criminal"based on the right of personality,and strengthen the relief path of non-civil compensation.So that it could provide better judicial safeguard measures for the governance of school bullying.

关 键 词：校园欺凌 法律责任 人格权 侵权行为 

分 类 号：G40[文化科学—教育学原理]