检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐汉英[1] Tang Hanying(Jinan Stomatological Hospital,Jinan 250199,Shandong Province,China)
出 处:《中外医药研究》2025年第3期9-11,共3页JOURNAL OF CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICINE AND PHARMACY RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:对常规种植牙和微创种植牙治疗的效果进行探究。方法:选择2022年10月—2023年10月于济南市口腔医院接受治疗的86例牙列缺损患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组(43例,行常规种植牙治疗)和试验组(43例,行微创种植牙治疗)。对比两组手术治疗效果。结果:试验组手术时间、术后牙龈肿胀时间短于对照组,术后视觉模拟评分法评分低于对照组(P<0.001);试验组种植体稳定系数、旋入扭矩值高于对照组(P<0.001);试验组术后总满意率高于对照组(P=0.035)。结论:与常规种植牙治疗相比,应用微创种植牙治疗可缩短手术时间,促进术后肿胀恢复,减轻术后疼痛7程度,患者术后满意度更高。Objective:To explore the effect of conventional dental implants and minimally invasive dental implants.Methods:A total of eighty-six patients with dentition defect who received treatment in Jinan Stomatological Hospital from October 2022 to October 2023 were selected as the study objects,and were randomly divided into control group(43 cases receiving conventional dental implant treatment)and experimental group(43 cases receiving minimally invasive dental implant treatment).The effect of operation was compared between the two groups.Results:The experimental group had shorter surgery time and gum swelling time after surgery compared to the control group,and the postoperative visual analog score was lower than that of the control group(P<0.001).The stability coefficient and rotary torque of experimental group were higher than those of control group(P<0.001).The total satisfaction rate of experimental group was higher than that of control group(P=0.035).Conclusion:Compared with conventional dental implants,the application of minimally invasive dental implants can shorten the operation time,promote the recovery of postoperative swelling,reduce the degree of postoperative pain,and improve patients'postoperative satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.228.10