裸体与动物生命——从德里达到阿甘本  

Nudity and Animal Life:From Derrida to Agamben

作　　者：庞红蕊[1] PANG Hongrui(Literature Department,Hebei Normal University)

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学文学院

出　　处：《基督教文化学刊》2023年第2期22-46,共25页Journal for the Study of Christian Culture

基　　金：河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“德里达与库切的动物思想之比较研究”(项目号:SQ201152)的成果

摘　　要：1996年,吉奥乔·阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben)发表了《绝对的内在性》(L’immanenza assoluta)一文。在该文结尾,他指出,关于“生命”这一概念,西方现代哲学史大体可呈现为两大脉络谱系:一种是超越性的脉络谱系,从康德到胡塞尔到海德格尔再到列维纳斯和德里达;一种是内在性的脉络谱系,从斯宾诺莎到尼采到海德格尔再到德勒兹和福柯。While Derrida and Agamben’s philosophical perspectives may differ significantly,they converge on the themes of nudity and animal life,while also critiquing the tendency of Western discourse to separate humans from animals.This paper conducts a comparative analysis of their respective ideas,aiming to uncover both the commonalities and distinctions in their thought.In each,“naked consciousness”emerges as a violent construct that perpetuates the division between humans and animals.The question then arises:How can we reshape the relationship between these two realms?Derrida delves into theological origins,interpreting God’s“in order to see”as a means to uncover its ethical potential.In contrast,Agamben presents“Messianic life”as a potent form of resistance,representing a Sabbathlike existence where all distinctions are suspended,and life takes on new purpose.While Derrida’s exploration primarily emphasizes the ethical dimension,Agamben’s inquiry is centered on the political dimension.By connecting these seemingly disparate modes of thinking,we may deepen our understanding of the shared concerns within contemporary continental philosophy.

关 键 词：西方现代哲学 阿甘本 海德格尔 列维纳斯 斯宾诺莎 德里达 德勒兹 内在性 

分 类 号：H059[语言文字—语言学]