检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡鸿瑜 韩勇[1,2] 何勇 孟昕 Cai Hongyu;Han Yong;He Yong;Meng Xin(Xiamen University of Technology,Xiamen 361024;Fujian Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing of Buses,Xiamen 361024;Xiamen Huaxia University,Xiamen 361024)
机构地区:[1]厦门理工学院,厦门361024 [2]福建省客车先进设计与制造重点实验室,厦门361024 [3]厦门华厦学院,厦门361024
出 处:《汽车技术》2025年第2期1-8,共8页Automobile Technology
基 金:福建省自然科学基金重点项目(2024J02031);厦门市自然科学基金面上项目(3502Z20227223)。
摘 要:为了避免在视觉障碍紧急工况下车辆碰撞行人事故的发生,针对存在视觉障碍的典型车辆-行人自动紧急制动(AEB)测试场景,提出了3种具有不同碰撞时间(TTC)和制动减速度的AEB触发策略(保守型、法规型、激进型),在2起典型视觉障碍事故场景条件下,基于PreScan、MATLAB/Simulink、CarSim等仿真平台建立事故场景和车辆动力学模型,并搭建AEB策略模型,对比分析3种AEB触发策略的制动有效性。结果表明:所搭建的AEB模型均能在典型行人碰撞场景中实现避撞,其中法规型制动策略规避效果最佳。To avoid the incidence of vehicle-pedestrian collision accidents under emergency scenarios involving visual impairments,this study focuses on typical vehicle-pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking(AEB)test scenarios with visual impediments.Three AEB triggering strategies,namely the conservative,regulatory,and aggressive strategies,are proposed,each characterized by distinct Time to Collision(TTC)values and braking deceleration profiles.Under the circumstances of two prototypical accident scenarios with visual impairments,accident scenarios and vehicle dynamics models are constructed using simulation platforms such as PreScan,MATLAB/Simulink,and CarSim.Subsequently,an AEB strategy model is developed.A comparative analysis is then conducted to evaluate the braking effectiveness of the three AEB triggering strategies.The results show that all the AEB models in this study can achieve collision avoidance in typical vehicle-pedestrian accident scenarios,with the regulatory braking strategy having the best avoidance effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170