“实践一般”范畴的三种解读及其对比  

Three Interpretations of the Category of “Practice in General”and Their Comparisons

作　　者：朱威 张振鹏 ZHU Wei;ZHANG Zhen-peng(Bohai University,Jinzhou 121000,China;Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China)

机构地区：[1]渤海大学马克思主义学院,辽宁锦州121000 [2]赣南师范大学中国共产党革命精神与文化资源研究中心,江西赣州341000

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2025年第2期16-20,共5页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：“实践一般”范畴是依据马克思提出“生产一般”范畴的基本方法和意旨所制定的,用以说明历史唯物主义实践范畴的学术性概念。在“实践一般”的解读线索中,逻辑与历史相统一地存在着教科书体系、人本主义马克思主义与历史唯物主义三种解读。前两者在不同程度上“矮化”或“夸大”了“实践一般”的规定性,因而遮蔽了历史唯物主义实践范畴的原初含义。在对三种解读的对比性梳理中,可以凸显历史唯物主义实践范畴“一般”与“特殊”相统一等一系列科学内涵。The category of“Practice in General”is formulated based on the fundamental methods and intentions of Marx's concept of“Production in General”to illustrate the academic concept of the Practice category in Historical Materialism.Within the interpretative framework of“Practice in General”,there are three interpretations that unify logic and history:the Textbook System,Humanistic Marxism,and Historical Materialism.The first two interpretations,to varying degrees,either“diminish”or“exaggerate”the determinacy of“Practice in General”,thus obscuring the original meaning of the Practice category in Historical Materialism.Through a comparative analysis of these three interpretations,a series of scientific connotations such as the unity of“general”and“particular”in the Practice category of Historical Materialism can be highlighted.

关 键 词：实践一般 实践特殊 传统教科书 人本主义 历史唯物主义 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]