谢枋得《批点檀弓》辨伪及价值探赜  

The Discrimination of Forgery and Exploration of Value in Xie Bingde’s Critical Comments on the Analects of Tan Gong

作　　者：陈思婷 CHEN Siting(School of Literature,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310030,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院,浙江杭州310030

出　　处：《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2025年第1期118-132,共15页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition

基　　金：浙江省重大项目“中华礼藏”子项目“丧礼专题研究”(105100+194442403/001/024)。

摘　　要：南宋谢枋得所撰《批点檀弓》,现存版本可依内容分为杨慎附注本、闵齐伋刻本及江澍畇辑校本。杨慎《檀弓丛训》后所附之谢氏《批点》,至少一半出自明人之手;而与《丛训》所附批点内容大相径庭的江澍畇辑校本,完全为明人缀集伪托。究其原因,除《檀弓》本身的文学价值很早被挖掘之外,既有明代经典文学化潮流的影响,也有张氏父子个人嗜好及杨慎显赫文名的推动,而八股取士与书商谋利的因素亦不容小觑。此书虽为伪作,但仍可视为明代文学评点之代表,同时也对明代礼学的发展有一定推动作用,其价值不可忽视。The extant editions of Critical Comments on the Analects of Tan Gong by Xie Bingde,a patriotic poet in the Southern Song dynasty,can be divided into three versions according to the contents:Tan Gong Cong Xun annotated by Yang Shen,Tan Gong,the block-printed edition by Min Qiji,and the edition collated by Jiang Shuyun.It was found that at least half of Tan Gong Comment were written by people in Ming dynasty,while Jiang Shuyun’s collated version,different from Tan Gong Comment,was totally feigned and forged by Ming people.The reasons,except that the literary value of Tan Gong itself has been early explored,are the influence of the classical literalization in the Ming dynasty,the personal preference of the influential father and son in Zhang clan,as well as the impetus of Yang Shen’s literary reputation.The impact of the Eight-part Essay Examination and profit-driven booksellers cannot be underestimated.Although the collated edition is a forgery,it can be regarded as a representative in the literary criticism and appreciation and has a certain role in promoting the study of the Book of Rites in the Ming dynasty.The value cannot be ignored.

关 键 词：《批点檀弓》 谢枋得 辨伪 价值 

分 类 号：K05[历史地理—历史学]