人工智能犯罪的人格构成及刑法回应  

Personality Constitution of Artificial Intelligence Crimes and Criminal Law Response

作　　者：赵东 温栋木 ZHAO Dong;WEN Dongmu(Law School,Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang 050061,China)

机构地区：[1]河北经贸大学法学院,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期82-89,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金资助项目“人工智能犯罪刑事司法问题研究”(HB20FX012)。

摘　　要：在本体视角下,人工智能通过计算机编程与建模、人工神经网络等技术手段,具备支配行为的“物化”意识人格要素;通过大数据的自我意识分析,具备基于因果功能联系的目的人格要素,其人格要素与自然人具有一致性。在社会视角下,人工智能在特定的行为领域中基于自身意识所作出的行为可以与特定的人与事物产生有限的联系,因而具备有限的社会人格要素,具有特殊性。因此,人工智能具备自我意识,能支配行为实现特定目的,进而在特定的行为领域具备完全的刑事责任能力。在此前提下,基于人工智能具备的有限社会人格要素,可创设强制学习劳动、销毁程序、缩减行为领域等针对人工智能犯罪的刑罚措施,以满足人工智能犯罪主体的刑罚适应要求。From an ontological perspective,artificial intelligence possesses the“materialized”consciousness and personality elements that govern behavior through computer programming and modeling,artificial neural networks,and other technical means.It also has purpose-oriented personality elements based on causal functional connections through self-conscious analysis of big data,which suggests that its personality elements are consistent with those of natural persons.From a social perspective,artificial intelligence,based on its own consciousness,can make limited connections with specific people and things in specific behavioral domains,thus possessing limited social personality elements and special characteristics.Therefore,artificial intelligence,with self-consciousness,can control behavior to achieve specific goals,thus having complete criminal responsibility in specific behavioralfields.Based on the limited social personality elements possessed by artificial intelligence,punishment measures for AI crimes,such as mandatory learning labor,destruction procedures,and reduction of behavioralfields can be created to meet the penalty adaptation requirements of AI crime subjects.

关 键 词：人工智能 人格要素 刑罚 自主意识 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]