人文遗迹民事公益诉讼适用惩罚性赔偿的实践探索与优化路径  

Practice Exploration and Optimization Path of Punitive Compensation Applied to Civil Public Interest Litigation of Cultural Relics

作　　者：张扩振 史胜男 ZHANG Kuo-zhen;SHI Sheng-nan(Shantou University,School of Law,Shantou 515063,China;School of Political Science and Law,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)

机构地区：[1]汕头大学法学院,广东汕头515063 [2]江西师范大学政法学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《宜春学院学报》2025年第1期42-49,共8页Journal of Yichun University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“规范性文件合宪性事先控制的体制机制研究”(项目编号:20BFX027);汕头大学科研启动经费项目“特殊教育普惠发展的法律实现机制研究”(项目编号:STF23021)。

摘　　要：根据司法解释,在民事公益诉讼中可以适用惩罚性赔偿。然而对人文遗迹领域的民事公益诉讼是否可以适用惩罚性赔偿仍存在广泛的争议,实践中法院也极少适用。基于人文遗迹适用惩罚性赔偿的必要性和司法实践的分析,人文遗迹公益诉讼适用惩罚性赔偿可以在惩罚性赔偿的数额确定、责任聚合时的处理方式、与私益赔偿金的衔接、惩罚性赔偿金的管理和使用等方面进行优化。如此可以更好地保护与生态系统密切相连的人文遗迹,同时维护生态系统的文化功能。According to judicial interpretation,punitive damages can be applied in civil public interest litigation.However,there is still widespread controversy over whether punitive damages can be applied to civil public interest litigation in the field of cultural relics,and courts rarely apply them in practice.Based on the necessity of applying punitive damages to cultural relics and the analysis of judicial practice,the application of punitive damages in public interest litigation for cultural relics can be optimized in terms of determining the amount of punitive damages,handling responsibility aggregation,connecting with private interest compensation,and managing and using punitive damages.This can better protect the cultural relics closely connected to the ecosystem,while maintaining the cultural function of the ecosystem.

关 键 词：人文遗迹 公益诉讼 惩罚性赔偿 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]