检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宇航 Zhang Yuhang(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,Jiangsu,China)
出 处:《征信》2024年第12期30-39,共10页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BFX075);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2242024S30050)。
摘 要:社会信用体系建设的深入推进使得犯罪信息纳入社会信用评价成为新趋势。目前实践中存在的主要问题是:立法层级过低,犯罪信息范围界定模糊,惩戒措施与犯罪行为缺乏关联,信用主体权益保护不足,救济机制缺失等。为完善犯罪信息纳入社会信用评价的法治化路径,应当提升立法层级,统一规范标准;区分犯罪类型与情节,合理界定纳入范围;增强惩戒措施与犯罪行为的关联性;健全信用主体权益保护机制;引入社会自治组织。以此在促进社会信用体系建设与保障个人权益之间寻求平衡,推动社会治理现代化。The deepening implementation of the social credit system has led to a new trend of incorporating criminal information into social credit evaluations.In practice,there are problems such as insufficient legislative hierarchy,ambiguous definition of criminal information scope,lack of correlation between punitive measures and criminal behavior,inadequate protection of credit subjects’rights,and absence of remedial mechanisms.To improve the legal pathway for incorporating criminal information into social credit evaluations,it is necessary to elevate the legislative hierarchy and standardize regulations;differentiate criminal types and circumstances to reasonably define the scope of inclusion;enhance the correlation between punitive measures and criminal behavior;strengthen the protection mechanism for credit subjects’rights;and introduce social self-governing organizations.This approach seeks to balance the promotion of the social credit system construction with the protection of individual rights,thereby advancing the modernization of social governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222