检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭延军[1] GUO Yanjun
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2025年第1期152-165,共14页Law Review
摘 要:环境法学界一直以来都很重视环境法学核心范畴的研究,且观点纷呈,但提出完整基本范畴体系的理论成果不多。鉴于实践法理学以理论理性和实践理性为基准形成的基本范畴在系统解释法现象方面具有的显著优势,本文主张与它们对接,生成环境法学的基本范畴体系,为环境法学增加一种理论选项。与实践法理学对接生成的环境法学基本范畴架构由七个概念构成,它们是:环境权利、环境权力、环境法权、环境剩余权、环境权、环境义务、环境法。环境法学并非一定得离开实践法学这个整体另行确立本二级学科的核心范畴,尽管环境法权确实处在七个基本范畴中最重要的位置。The environmental jurisprudence community has always emphasized the importance of studies on the core(or cornerstone) category of environmental law. The perspectives of these studies are varied, but few produce theoretical achievements that introduce complete basic category systems. Considering the obvious advantages of the basic category system demonstrated by practical jurisprudence in the systematic explanation of legal phenomena, this paper advocates the jointing between environmental jurisprudence and practical jurisprudence. Such jointing would generate the basic category system of environmental jurisprudence, and add an option to the theoretical approach of environmental jurisprudence. The basic framework of environmental jurisprudence that joints with practical jurisprudence is composed of seven concepts: environmental right, environmental power, environmental Faquan, environmental residual right, environmental Quan, environmental duty, and environmental law. Environmental jurisprudence, as a subordinate discipline, does not necessarily have to be separated from the whole of practical jurisprudence to establish a core category, although environmental Faquan does occupy the most important position among the seven basic categories.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43