检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奥雷利昂·拉加涅 杜明鸣(译) 王秋蕾(审校) Aurélien Ragaigne;Mingming Du(CREM,University of Rennes,France;不详)
机构地区:[1]国际公共管理研究协会(AIRMAP)董事会 [2]中国人事科学研究院绩效管理与考核奖惩研究室 [3]不详
出 处:《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》2023年第4期216-232,共17页International Review of Administrative Sciences
摘 要:本文分析了对话在管理公共当局内部自主性和遵从性矛盾中的作用。有关矛盾的文献认为管理的特点是矛盾因素的共存。我们借鉴有关“对话”概念的文献,以此为基础开展研究工作。法国部门委员会制定了管理其工作人员差旅授权的程序,本文以该委员会为案例,研究了利益相关者之间的对话如何既确保了程序设定框架的应用,又保证了管理团队在管理这些规则时的自主性。通过采用将半指导性访谈和工作组会议观察相结合的纵向分析方法,我们发现这种对话空间为遵从性和自主性需求之间的博弈,及其进一步演变发挥了重要作用。Our paper analyses the role of dialogue in managing the autonomy and compliance paradox within a public authority.The literature on paradoxes presents management as being characterised by the coexistence of contradictory elements.We propose to build on this work by drawing on the literature on the concept of‘dialogue'.By focusing on the case of a French Departmental Council that set up a procedure to manage travel authorisations for its staff,we study the way in which the dialogue between stakeholders ensured both the application of the framework prescribed by the procedure and the autonomy of the management teams when it came to managing these rules on the ground.Using a longitudinal analysis methodology combining semi-directive interviews and observations of working group meetings,we show that this space for dialogue provides an important opportunity for a face-off between the demands for compliance and autonomy and their further evolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249