检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田博博 TIAN Bo-bo
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2024年第5期64-76,共13页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:司法部法治建设与法学理论研究项目“侦查程序中调取个人信息的法律规制”(22SFB5031);四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地——社会治理创新研究中心项目“刑事电子数据取证的法治化研究”(SHZLYB2408)
摘 要:场域的转变使侦查权与公民权利发生了剧烈变动,一方面,部分侦查权在网络信息技术的助力下出现了外溢;另一方面,公民权利也突破了传统物理场域的限制,呈现出数字时代所具有的新形态。虽然现有法律对侦查权进行了规制,但法律修订的进度与科学技术的发展速度没有完全同步,法律对一些侦查措施的规制仍存在一些缺陷。比如,现有法律对数据调取措施存在法律性质界定不够清晰、运用程序较粗疏、法律后果不明确、监督救济路径不足,等等。因此,为保障公安机关数据调取措施运用在法律规定上的统一性、融贯性与协调性,应从实体和程序两方面入手对其相关规定进行调适,从而将其更好地融入法治轨道之中。The shift of the field has led to dramatic changes in partial the power of criminal investigation and citizens'rights.On the one hand,the power of criminal investigation has expanded beyond the traditional physical field with the help of network information technology.On the other hand,citizens'rights have broken through the limitations of traditional physical fields and taken on new forms in the digital age.Although the existing legal framework has regulated the power of criminal investigation,the pace of legal revision has not kept pace with the development of science and technology,and the legal regulation of some investigation measures still has some defects.For example,the existing law has insufficient clarity in defining the legal nature of data access measures,a rough procedure for their application,unclear legal consequences,and insufficient supervision and remedies.Therefore,in order to ensure the uniformity,coherence and coordination of the legal provisions on the use of police data access measures,it is necessary to adjust the relevant provisions from both the sub⁃stantive and procedural aspects,so as to smoothly integrate them into the rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3