检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:桑松杨 Sang Songyang
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学文学与新闻传播学院
出 处:《人权研究(辑刊)》2024年第1期152-187,344-345,共38页Journal of Human Rights
摘 要:如果法律允许当事人将其在违约、侵权、婚姻、继承、收养、劳动、无因管理及不当得利等纠纷中享有的有关赔偿请求的诉权转让给第三人,就有可能开放一个规模很大的诉权交易市场,促成数量庞大的互利交易,并带来一系列延伸性的社会收益,包括但不限于改善融资环境、扩张市场边界以及增强法律威慑。虽然诉权交易的理论基础相当扎实,国外的制度实践也有接近30年的历史,但考虑到诉权交易的潜在障碍和衍生风险,仍需谨慎评估我国开放市场的利弊得失。If the law allows a party to assign to a third party his right of action in respect of claims for compensation in disputes such as breach of contract,tort,marriage,inheritance,adoption,Labour,gratuitous administration and unjust enrichment,it will be likely to open a large-scale legal claim market,lead to a huge number of transactions on mutually beneficial basis and create a series of extended social income,including but not limited to improving the financing environment,expanding the market boundary and reinforcing the deterrence of law.Although the alienability of legal claim has quite solid theoretical foundation and the practice of foreign system has nearly three decades of history,we have to be cautious and take precautions about evaluating the pros and cons of opening the market and preconceive legal tools and path selection for market regulation considering potential obstacles and derivative risks of the alienability of legal claim.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28