“五育融合”视域下高校体育课程评价变革的价值表征、现实困囿及纾解方略  

University Physical Education Curriculum Evaluation Reform from the Perspective of Five-Domain Integration:Value Representation,Realistic Constraints and Relief Strategies

作　　者：张伟[1] 曹国创 田祥成 Zhang Wei;Cao Guochuang;Tian Xiangcheng(School of Physical Education,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学体育学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《体育科技文献通报》2025年第1期159-162,166,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology

摘　　要：“五育融合”是新时代教育改革的重要举措,为高校体育课程评价提供了新的理论框架和实践路径。本文采用文献资料法、实地考察法、逻辑分析法等研究方法,立足于“五育融合”的视角,对高校体育课程评价变革的价值表征及其现实困囿进行深入探讨,并提出纾解方略。研究发现:当前高校体育课程评价变革的价值表征主要体现在个人层面、社会层面和国家层面。高校体育课程评价变革主要面临着课程评价标准模糊、评价工具单一、过程性评价手段不足、评价主体单一和师资素质参差不齐等现实困囿,导致评价难以全面反映学生的多元发展需求,也无法为教学改进提供有效反馈。据此,提出以下纾解方略:(1)引入多元评价维度,实施差异化评价机制;(2)开发多元化评价方法和过程性评价工具;(3)构建多元化评价体系,打破评价主体局限;(4)强化教师继续教育工作,促进教师综合评价能力提升;(5)引入动态评价反馈机制,推动反思与改进。Five-Domain Integration is an important measure of educational reform in the new era,providing a new theoretical framework and practical path for university physical education(PE)curriculum evaluation.We used literature research method,field investigation,and logical analysis.From the perspective of Five-Domain Integration,this study delves into the value representation and practical constraints of university PE curriculum evaluation reform and proposes relief strategies.The research finds that the current value representation of university PE curriculum evaluation reform mainly lies at the individual level,social level,and national level.university PE curriculum evaluation reform mainly faces practical constraints such as ambiguous evaluation standards,single evaluation tools,insufficient process evaluation means,single evaluation subjects,and uneven teacher quality,making it difficult for the evaluation to comprehensively reflect students'diverse development needs and also fail to provide effective feedback for teaching improvement.Based on this,the following relief strategies are proposed:(i)Introduce multiple evaluation dimensions and implement differentiated evaluation mechanisms;(ii)Develop diversified evaluation methods and process evaluation tools;(iii)Build a diversified evaluation system and break the limitations of evaluation subjects;(iv)Strengthen teachers'continuing education and promote the improvement of their comprehensive capabilities;(v)Introduce a dynamic evaluation feedback mechanism to promote reflection and improvement.

关 键 词：体育课程评价 五育融合 多元评价 动态评价 全面发展 

分 类 号：G807.4[文化科学—体育训练]