检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭烁 GUO Shuo
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院
出 处:《法学研究》2025年第1期172-189,共18页Chinese Journal of Law
摘 要:法院受理公诉意味着公诉的合法性受到法院肯认,案件与受诉法院之间形成诉讼系属法律关系,进而产生诉讼客体确定、诉讼拘束确定以及(未来的)上诉审法院确定等法律效果。检视法理逻辑和司法实务,对法院受理公诉的条件有所限制,乃确保诉讼系属法律效果正确实现的制度必然。这些限制性条件,本质上包含案件的受审资格(审判权)、法院的管辖资格(管辖权)以及公诉的提起资格(起诉条件)三个层次。公诉缺乏以上任一条件,不能成立诉讼系属关系,刑事追诉欠缺合法性基础,法院没有进行实体审理从而作出有罪或无罪判决的程序空间;应然的处理方式,是由受请求法院作出以公诉不法为评价内容的终局处分。这种处分,在大陆法系理论中是以“驳回公诉”为内容的形式裁判。在我国刑事诉讼语境下,引入针对诉讼系属不能成立的驳回公诉裁判,既能弥补现有规范中欠缺公诉合法性评价机制的不足,又契合“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革、案件质量提升和轻罪治理之起诉控制的时代课题,兼具法理层面的正当性和实务层面的现实必要性。The acceptance of a public prosecution by a court signifies the court's acknowledgment of the prosecution's legality,thereby establishing a legal relationship of lis pendens between the case and the court.This relationship subsequently determines the object and the binding effect of litigation as well as the(future)appellate court.An examination on legal principles and judicial practice reveals that condi-tions restricting a court's acceptance of a public prosecution are vital to ensure the correct realization of the legal effects of lis pendens.These restrictive conditions essentially involve three levels,that is,the case's eligibility for trial(judicial authority),the eligibility of court's jurisdiction(jurisdiction),and the eligibility of the prosecution(prosecution conditions).If a public prosecution lacks any of these conditions,it cannot establish lis pendens,which means it lacks a legal foundation and the court has no procedural space to substantively hear the case and render a"guilty"or"not guilty"verdict consequent-ly.The appropriate solution for the requested court is to make a final disposition evaluating the public prosecution as unlawful.In the theoretical context of civil law system,such a disposition takes the form of a formal judgment to dismiss the public prosecution.Introducing such experience into the Chinese criminal procedure not only compensates for the deficiencies in the current normative mechanism for e-valuating the legality of prosecution,but also aligns with the current issues of implementing"trial-cen-tered litigation system reform",improving case quality,and controlling prosecution for minor offenses,and therefore has both theoretical legitimacy and practical necessity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90