问题和语境:当下中国家庭研究热点及其范式争议  

Issues and Contexts:Current Hotspots and Paradigm Debates in Chinese Family Research

作　　者：吴小英[1] Wu Xiaoying

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院社会学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《学海》2025年第1期137-154,215,共19页Academia Bimestris

摘　　要：2010年以来国内家庭社会学进入新的繁盛阶段,相关热点问题可以划分为三个不同维度:来自政府的、来自社会大众的以及来自学界自身的。围绕着现代性与家庭之间的关系这一线索,这些研究热点可以概略地划分为社会变迁中的家庭与家庭视野中的社会这两个方向,其焦点在于探索现代性与家庭之间在转型社会是如何相互塑造的。同时,家庭研究的不断丰富和分化也体现在研究范式的多元并存上,依据研究取向和共同体的差异,可以归纳为个体主义脉络的研究范式和家庭主义脉络的研究范式。二者最大的差别在于对家庭概念的阐释是以理念还是实践为出发点,以及对家庭主义究竟作为“权宜之策”还是“伦理之义”的不同预设,表明两类范式或许需要设定各自的适用条件和语境,才能构成完整的研究框架。Since 2010,family sociology in China has entered a new flourishing stage.The related hot issues can be divided into three different dimensions:those from the government,the general public,and those from the academic community itself.Centering on the relationship between modernity and the family,these research hotspots can be roughly divided into two directions:the family in social change and society from the perspective of the family.The focus is on exploring how modernity and the family shape each other in a transitional society.At the same time,the continuous enrichment and differentiation of family research are also reflected in the diversity of research paradigms.According to the differences in research orientation and community,they can be summarized as research paradigms of individualism and familism.The biggest difference between the two lies in whether the interpretation of the family concept starts from the idea or practice,and the different presuppositions about whether familism is a "temporary measure" or an " ethical principle".This indicates that the two types of paradigms may need to set their own applicable conditions and contexts to form a complete research framework.

关 键 词：语境 范式 个体主义 家庭主义 乡土派 社会基础派 

分 类 号：C913.11[经济管理]