广西医药卫生适宜技术推广奖社会影响力调查研究与经验启示  

Investigation research and experience inspiration of social influence on Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Promotion Award

作　　者：蔡金华 唐蔚 王红宇 陈丽萍 冯启明 CAI Jinhua;TANG Wei;WANG Hongyu;CHEN Liping;FENG Qiming(School of Information and Management,Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,Guangxi,China;Guangxi Medical Information Institute,Nanning 530029,Guangxi,China;Guangxi Health Science and Education Management Association,Nanning 530029,Guangxi,China)

机构地区：[1]广西医科大学信息与管理学院,广西南宁市530021 [2]广西壮族自治区医学科学信息研究所,广西南宁市530029 [3]广西卫生科教管理学会,广西南宁市530029

出　　处：《广西医学》2025年第1期100-107,共8页Guangxi Medical Journal

基　　金：广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20211492);广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(S2019116)。

摘　　要：目的了解广西医药卫生适宜技术推广奖(以下简称适宜奖)的社会影响力,并总结适宜奖的组织评审经验,为提升社会力量设立科学技术奖的管理水平提供参考。方法对广西35家医疗卫生单位医药卫生技术人员进行问卷调查,比较和分析调查对象对适宜奖的社会影响力评价情况、适宜奖存在的主要问题,以及对适宜奖的意见及建议。结果(1)共发放调查问卷2879份,回收有效调查问卷2856份,有效回收率为99.2%。(2)64.01%的调查对象对适宜奖非常了解及比较了解,72.79%的调查对象认为适宜奖的权威性大及比较大,77.87%的调查对象认为适宜奖在医疗卫生行业中认可度高及较高,52.20%的调查对象对广西卫生科教信息管理系统熟悉及有所了解且会在系统上申报适宜奖。不同职称的调查对象对适宜奖的了解程度、了解广西卫生科教信息管理系统并且会在系统上申报适宜奖的情况,以及对适宜奖的权威性、认可度的评价情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中,高级职称者对适宜奖的了解率、对适宜奖的权威率、对适宜奖的认可率,以及对广西卫生科教信息管理系统及其系统申报流程的了解率高于中级及以下职称者(P<0.05)。(3)分别有79.56%、78.02%、80.78%的调查对象认为适宜奖评审过程公正及比较公正、透明及比较透明、评审组织管理规范及比较规范。不同职称的调查对象对适宜奖评审过程的公正性、透明度、评审组织管理的规范性的评价情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),高级职称者认为适宜奖评审过程的公正率、透明率、评审组织管理规范率高于中级及以下职称者(P<0.05)。(4)适宜奖存在的主要问题为奖励力度不够、公开程度不够、评审指标体系欠科学。(5)不同职称的调查对象对适宜奖奖励名额的定额方法的选择情况、对科研诚信问题的处理意见比较,差异无统计学意义(PObjective To understand the social influence on Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Promotion Award(hereinafter referred to as Appropriate Award),and to summarize the organizational review experiences of Appropriate Award,so as to provide a reference for improving management level of science and technology awards established by social forces.Methods Questionnaire investigation was performed on medical and health technical personnel from 35 medical and health institutions in Guangxi.The evaluation states of social influence,main problems existed,and comments and suggestions of Appropriate Award were compared and analyzed between investigation subjects.Results(1)A total of 2879 investigation questionnaires were issued,2856 valid questionnaires were effectively collected,with an effective recovery rate of 99.2%.(2)Investigation subjects in 64.01% had a very good or a relatively good understanding of Appropriate Award,72.79% of investigation subjects thought that the authority of Appropriate Award was large or relatively large,77.87% of them believed that Appropriate Award was highly recognized or relatively high-recognized in the medical and health industry,and 52.20% of them were familiar with and had some understanding of Guangxi Health Science and Education Information Management System and would declare Appropriate Award on the system.There were statistically significant differences in the understanding of Appropriate Award,the understanding of Guangxi Health Science and Education Information Management System and the declaration of Appropriate Award on the system,and the evaluation of the authority and recognition of Appropriate Award between investigation subjects with different professional titles(P<0.05),therein individuals with senior professional title exhibited higher understanding rate of Appropriate Award,authority rate of Appropriate Award,recognition rate of Appropriate Award,and understanding rate of Guangxi Health Science and Education Information Management System and its declaration

关 键 词：科技奖励 社会影响力 医药卫生 调查 适宜技术推广奖 广西壮族自治区 

分 类 号：R-1[医药卫生]