完善高校学术评价体系的思考  

Thoughts on improving the academic evaluation system in universities

作　　者：韦春霞[1] 胡子龙[1] 张蕾[1] WEI Chunxia;HU Zilong;ZHANG Lei(Office of Social Sciences Research,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400030,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]重庆大学社会科学研究处,重庆400030

出　　处：《高等建筑教育》2025年第1期70-76,共7页Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning

摘　　要：我国高校不断推进“双一流”建设,如何建立科学、完备的学术评价体系正日益成为影响高校学术事业长远发展的重要因素。只有厘清学术评价的概念和特点,明确学术评价的独立性、客观性、权威性,深刻理解完善学术评价体系对于不断增强国家综合实力的重要意义,正视当前学术评价工作中存在的学科差异关注度不够、破“五唯”落实不够、同行评议待完善等主要问题,才能从宏观视角着手,落实破“五唯”、强化学部职能、优化人才项目体系。同时以微观视角为抓手,在学术评价工作中做到尊重学科差异、定性与定量相结合、优化同行评议,从而不断完善高校学术评价体系,推动高校学术事业发展,助力国家科技文化实力提升,为树立文化自信奠定坚实基础。In pace with promoting of the Double First-Class Construction of Chinese Universities,a scientific and complete academic evaluation system is becoming an important influencing factor on the long-term development of academic career.We need to figure out the concept and characteristic of academic evaluation,maintain the independence,objectivity,authority of academic evaluation,keen appreciation of the important implications on enhancing the comprehensive strength of the country by improving academic evaluation system,and face up to the problems such as the insufficiency of attention to disciplinary differences in academic evaluation,implementing of eliminating the five-only,improving of peer assessment.Then we could fulfill eliminating the five-only,strengthen the functions of faculties,optimize talent project system,and respect the disciplinary differences in academic evaluation,combine qualitative and quantitative methods,improve the peer assessment.Finally,we could continuously improve the academic evaluation system of universities,promote the development of academic career,help to enhance the national technological and cultural strength,and lay the foundation of cultural confidence.

关 键 词：学术评价 学科差异 学部职能 破“五唯” 同行评议 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]