发展危机问卷的中文版修订及信效度检验  

Revision of the Chinese Version of the Developmental Crisis Questionnaire and its Reliability and Validity Test

作　　者：王湃 杨伊生 张亚利 Sofya NARTOVA-BOCHAVER Victoria YEROFEYEVA WANG Pai;YANG Yi-sheng;ZHANG Ya-li;Sofya NARTOVA-BOCHAVER;Victoria YEROFEYEVA(School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China;Key Laboratory of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China;School of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China;School of Psychology,National Research University Higher School of Economics,Moscow 101000,Russia)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特010022 [2]内蒙古自治区心理学重点实验室,呼和浩特010022 [3]河北师范大学教育学院,石家庄050024 [4]俄罗斯国立高等经济大学心理学院,莫斯科俄罗斯101000

出　　处：《应用心理学》2025年第1期45-53,共9页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology

基　　金：内蒙古民族教育研究基地项目(项目编号:MZJY202211);内蒙古自治区博士研究生科研创新项目(项目编号:B20231048Z);吉林省教育厅社科优秀青年项目(项目编号:JJKH20251403SK);吉林省教育科学“十三五”规划重点课题(项目编号:ZD20033)。

摘　　要：本研究旨在修订发展危机问卷(Developmental Crisis Questionnaire,DCQ),并在成年群体中检验其信度和效度。研究首先通过项目分析和探索性因素分析确定中文版DCQ题目,用验证性因素分析确定其结构,最后进行问卷的信效度检验。结果表明中文版DCQ 10个条目具有良好的区分度,探索性和验证性因素分析结果均支持三因子结构,量表的信效度符合测量学要求。修订后中文版DCQ符合测量学标准,可作为测量我国成年人发展危机的可靠工具。The current study aimed to revise the Developmental Crisis Questionnaire(DCQ)and test its reliability and validity in adult age groups. The Chinese version of DCQ was determined by item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,and its structure was determined by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally,the reliability and validity of the scale were tested. Results showed that 10 items of Chinese DCQ had good differentiation. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis all supported the three-factor structure,and the reliability and validity of the scale met the requirements of measurement. There fore, the revised Chinese version of DCQ meets the standards of measurement and can be used as a reliable tool to measure developmental crisis of Chinese adult.

关 键 词：发展危机 信度 效度 成年人 

分 类 号：B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学]