检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施红星[1] 杜涓 SHI Hongxing;DU Juan(Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan Province 675000;School of Education,Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan Province 675000)
机构地区:[1]楚雄师范学院,云南楚雄675000 [2]楚雄师范学院教育学院,云南楚雄675000
出 处:《楚雄师范学院学报》2025年第1期54-59,共6页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
基 金:云南省高等教育本科教学成果立项培育项目“聚焦乡村教育高质量发展的地方优师专项师范生培养体系构建与实践”。
摘 要:师范类专业认证是高等教育普及化和国家培养基础教育师资战略背景下,提升专业办学内涵和人才培养质量的重要举措。认证机制及实践在促进师范类专业回归人才培养本源、规范办学行为、提升师范生培养质量等方面取得明显成效,但也存在理念学习局限、评建工作同质化、持续改进不足等问题。针对上述问题,文章提出强化分层培训、优化认证体系、严格审核要求、落实长效机制等策略,以期为提升师范类专业认证效能,进而提升人才培养质量提供理论与实践的借鉴。Professional accreditation of normal education is an important measure to enhance educational content and quality of student development in the strategic context of popularization of higher education and the State’s plan to cultivate normal students.Although notable achievements have been attained in returning to the original educational goal,standardizing educational behavior,improving quality of graduates of normal education in this accreditation mechanism and its practice,problems do exist in terms of limited notion acquisition,homogeneity in evaluation and discontinuity in improvement.To solve the above problems,this paper suggests as countermeasures strengthening layered training,optimizing the accreditation mechanism,applying strict examination,and adopting long-term mechanism so as to provide some reference,both in theory and practice,for improving effect of accreditation of normal education to eventually enhance quality of graduates of normal education.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.33.186