生命美学不属于后实践美学再论  

Add to Favorite Re-discussion on Life Aesthetics Not Being Part of Post-practice Aesthetics

作　　者：潘知常 PAN Zhichang

机构地区：[1]南京大学艺术学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2025年第1期270-290,共21页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：关于生命美学不属于后实践美学(时期、思潮),在“摆事实”之后,随之而来的,还必须是“讲道理”。事实证明:生命美学自身的理论思考也是“首创+独创”,不仅“时间上在先”,而且也“逻辑上在先”。早在1985年,生命美学就已经摒弃以“实践”为逻辑起点的美学研究,并且率先易道而行,在国内第一个开始了以“生命”为逻辑起点的美学研究,而后实践美学(时期、思潮)对于实践美学的反省却是直到9年之后的1994年才姗姗来迟。因此倘若就摒弃以“实践”为逻辑起点的美学研究并且率先易道而行而言,后实践美学(时期、思潮)是远远地落在了生命美学的后面的。而生命美学把自己的探索扩展到“理论、历史(中西美学)、现状”的工作则是在1998年左右就已经完成,但是后实践美学(时期、思潮)的这一工作却是在2008年才刚刚开始,因此也是远远地落在了生命美学的后面的。同时,国内的所谓后实践美学(时期、思潮)乃至所谓新实践美学(时期、思潮)或者新古典美学(时期、思潮)等等,其代表人物往往都是单枪匹马的个人,也只有一两本专著,但是,生命美学即便只是到2008年为止,也已经有众多的学者参加,而且也已经出版了40本左右的生命美学专著。因此,在学术影响方面,后实践美学(时期、思潮)也是远远地落在了生命美学的后面的。把由几十位学者拥护的生命美学安置在单枪匹马的超越美学或后实践美学的麾下,无疑并不合适。总之,结论必然是:生命美学不属于后实践美学。Regarding the fact that the aesthetics of life does not belong to post-practice aesthetics(period,trend),after presenting the facts,it is also necessary to provide reasoning.Facts have shown that the theoretical considerations of the aesthetics of life are also“original and innovative”,not only“temporally prior”but also“logically prior”.As early as 1985,the aesthetics of life had abandoned the aesthetic research with“practice”as the logical starting point,and took the lead in changing the path,starting the aesthetic research with“life”as the logical point in China for the first time,and then the reflection of practical aesthetics on practical aesthetics did not come until 1994,nine years later.Therefore,if we abandon the aesthetic research with“practice”as the logical starting point and take the lead in changing the way,the post-practice aesthetics is far behind the life aesthetics.The work of life aesthetics to expand its exploration to“theory,history(Chinese and Western aesthetics),and the status quo”was completed around 1998,but the work of post-practical aesthetics just started in 2008,so it is far behind the life aesthetics.The representative figures of the so-called post-practice aesthetics,new practical aesthetics,or neoclassical aesthetics in China are often individuals working alone,with only one or two monographs.But up to 2008,there have been numerous scholars participating in the aesthetics of life,and about 40 monographs on the aesthetics of life have been published.Therefore,in terms of academic influence,post-practice aesthetics lags far behind life aesthetics.It is undoubtedly inappropriate to place the aesthetics of life supported by dozens of scholars under the banner of single-handedly transcendental aesthetics or post-practical aesthetics.In a word,the conclusion must be that life aesthetics does not belong to post-practice aesthetics.

关 键 词：生命美学 后实践美学 超越美学 逻辑上在先 首创 独创 

分 类 号：B83[哲学宗教—美学]