智能时代摆脱“普罗米修斯的羞愧”何以可能?——技术“替代”图景下教育“过时性”的隐忧与超越  

How Is It Possible to Get Rid of“Promethean Shame”in the Intelligent Era?The Hidden Worries and Transcendence of Education’s Obsolescence in the Perspective of Technological Substitution

作　　者：滕长利 Teng Changli(School of Management,Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563003)

机构地区：[1]遵义医科大学管理学院,贵州563003

出　　处：《中国远程教育》2025年第1期86-95,共10页Chinese Journal of Distance Education

基　　金：贵州省2023年度哲学社会科学规划课题“数字依附视阈下贵州高等教育评价改革的重难点及对策研究”(课题编号:23GZQN64)。

摘　　要：智能时代技术正在深刻改变和塑造教育生活的各个方面,形成了技术工具与教育中各项要素进行比较的教育景观和社会事实。人们逐渐承认技术工具应用于教育实践的优越性,使得技术工具已经不仅仅是教育中“人体器官的延长”,更日益显示出对教育中各项要素的“替代”作用,进而诱发了京特·安德斯后人类主义视角下教育领域的“普罗米修斯的羞愧”,即“人不如自己创造的机器”的羞愧感。探讨技术“替代”图景下教育的“过时性”现象,不是为了否定技术,而是将普遍怀疑作为哲学方法,引领人们理性地寻找基于教育本质的技术重塑路径,并对其进行修正、突破、深化和超越,以帮助“日益脱离人控制”的技术“回归”到促进人的精神完满和构建美好生活的神圣与魅力。Technology in the intelligent era is profoundly changing and shaping various aspects of educational life,forming an educational landscape and social reality where technological tools are compared with various elements in education.People gradually acknowledge the superiority of using technological tools in educational practice,making them not only an extension of human organs in education,but also increasingly showing their“replacement”role in various elements of education.This has further led to the“Promethean shame”in the field of education from the perspective of Gunther Anders’post humanism,that is,the shame that“humans are not as good as machines they create”.Exploring the phenomenon of“obsolescence”in education under the context of technological“substitution”is not to deny technology,but to use universal skepticism as a philosophical method to guide people to rationally seek a technological reshaping path based on the essence of education,and to correct,break through,deepen,and surpass it,in order to help“technology that is increasingly detached from human control”return to promoting the sanctity and charm of spiritual fulfillment and building a better life.

关 键 词：智能时代 教育的过时性 技术工具 重塑教育 

分 类 号：G40-03[文化科学—教育学原理]