何以透明,以何透明:高等教育的AIGC剽窃与技术之治  

How to Be Transparent and with What:AIGC Plagiarism and the Technocracy in Higher Education

作　　者：张韬略[1] 陈沪楠 Zhang Taolue;Chen Hunan(Internet and AI Law Research Centre,School of Law,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092)

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院互联网与人工智能法律研究中心,上海200092

出　　处：《中国远程教育》2025年第1期113-128,共16页Chinese Journal of Distance Education

基　　金：浙江省人大常委会办公厅2023年委托项目“人工智能发展及其立法”(项目编号:07012600049)。

摘　　要：高等教育中的学术剽窃在生成式人工智能的影响下呈现出新的样态。回顾几次重大技术变革所带来的剽窃概念及其规制手段的历史演变,技术既是推动者也是破局者。现有剽窃概念在适配滥用AIGC的行为上存在一定障碍,《著作权法》《学位法》与高校学生诚信政策均未能对此提供清晰的规范指引,传统相似度检测技术与思路捉襟见肘。我国高等教育的政策制定者应优先考虑技术治理路径,通过引入生成式数字水印等标识技术,以AIGC使用行为的透明度这一最基本原则为核心,构建高等教育中规范利用AIGC的具体规则。Academic plagiarism in higher education has shown a trend of alienation and escalation in the GAI era.Reviewing the historical evolution of the concept of plagiarism and the means of regulating it as a result of several major technological innovations,technology has been both an promoter and a game-changer.The existing concept of plagiarism has certain obstacles in adapting to the misuse of AIGC.The copyright law,the academic degree law and the student integrity policy of higher education have failed to provide clear normative guidelines,and the traditional similarity detection techniques and ideas are stretched to the limit.The policy makers of higher education should give priority to the technocracy path,and construct specific rules for regulating the use of AIGC in higher education through identification technologies such as generative digital watermarks,with the most basic principle of transparency in the use of AIGC as the core.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 人工智能生成内容 高等教育 剽窃 学术剽窃 人工智能代笔 

分 类 号：G521[文化科学—教育学]