检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡莎 HU Sha(Guangdong Institute of Rule of Law,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学广东法治研究院,广东广州510006
出 处:《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期112-124,共13页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:大模型自动驾驶汽车,与工业时代的其他产品或传统汽车相比,具有深度自主学习能力与独立的驾驶意志,这在刑法上具有颠覆性。当大模型自动驾驶汽车涉及产品过失犯罪或交通犯罪时,应由制造商承担单位犯罪刑事责任,其具体内容为智能时代的产品罪责。智能时代的产品罪责,是由传统的意志罪责、人格罪责、社会罪责或目的罪责演进而来,其认定前提是立法机关应为承担产品罪责的制造商增设配套的过失犯罪与单位犯罪形态。司法机关适用制造商的智能产品罪责时,应赋予大模型自动驾驶制造商发展风险抗辩权与申请企业合规的权利。Large-model self-driving cars,compared with other products or traditional vehicles,possess deep autonomous learning capabilities and independent driving will,which is revolutionary in criminal law.When Large-model autonomous vehicles are involved in product negligence crimes or traffic crimes,the manufacturers should bear criminal responsibility as corporate crimes and negligence crimes,to be specific,the product culpability in the intelligent era.The product culpability in the intelligent era evolved from traditional criminal responsibilities,which are respectively based on will,personality,society and purpose.The premise for its determination is that the legislature should add supporting forms of negligence crimes and corporate crimes for manufacturers who bear the product liability.When judicial authorities apply product culpability to manufacturers,they should grant large-model self-driving vehicle manufacturers the right to defend against development risks and the right to apply for corporate compliance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49