《文心雕龙》与宋玉文学史地位  

The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons and the Status of Song Yu in Literary History

作　　者：曾子适 Zeng Zishi(School of Humanities,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学人文学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《洛阳师范学院学报》2025年第1期46-49,共4页Journal of Luoyang Normal University

摘　　要：历代关于宋玉中国文学史地位的评价,以“承继屈原”与“屈宋并称”为主,亦有相关否定说法。刘勰《文心雕龙》是将屈原、宋玉并称的首例记载。运用文本分析研究法,基于刘勰《文心雕龙》的定量统计,通过整理刘勰对宋玉文学作品与其文风的评点论述以及《文心雕龙》征引宋玉作品的数量情况,归纳宋玉散体赋中“叙事开篇”“君臣问对”“散句结语”“君主结语”“铺陈描绘”的问对定式,以此探讨宋玉对于汉赋“立体之大要”的意义,进而证明刘勰“屈宋并称”说法的准确性。The viewpoints on evaluation of Song Yu’s status in the history of Chinese literature throughout the dynasties are mainly presented with“Song Yu as a successor of Qu Yuan”or“Song Yu enjoying the same reputation as Qu Yuan”,and Liu Xie’s The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons should be the first record of Qu Yuan and Song Yu as eminent literary giants.Using the method of text analysis,based on the quantitative statistics of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon,the researcher combed Liu Xie’s comments on Song Yu’s literary works and his style of writing plus the number of Song Yu’s works cited in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon,summarized the“narrative introduction”,“question-answering between the monarch and officials”,“prose conclusion”,“monarch’s conclusion”and“elaborate description”in Song Yu’s prose-style Fu,so as to explore the significance of Song Yu’s viewpoints on the writing style of Han-dynasty Fu,and then prove the rationality of Liu Xie’s statement“Song Yu enjoying the same reputation as Qu Yuan”.

关 键 词：《文心雕龙》 宋玉 文学史地位 汉赋 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]