检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁中华[1] Yuan Zhonghua(Law School of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《政法论丛》2025年第1期54-67,共14页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:湖北省教育厅人文社科项目“程序法视野下《民法典》之规范表达”(21Y183)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:从诉讼标的论争可以发现,传统的新说及旧说具有鲜明的概念法学特征,而相对说则具有明显的论题学倾向。概念法学重视外部体系而忽视价值问题,论题学重视价值而忽视了法规范的拘束以及法体系的意义,而当下主流的评价法学则通过倡导价值导向思维和内部体系建设,从而能致力于正当的裁判和正当的法秩序。对此,在民事诉讼法学方法论上应当坚持评价法学,从而既能恰当处理外部体系从而达致法概念、法规则层面的统一、协调,又能恰当处理内部体系从而实现价值层面的妥当性。由此,在诉讼标的问题上,一方面需要去区分概念性和功能性的诉讼标的,并辅之以诉的合并、争点效等规则的建构;另一方面则需要贯彻纠纷的一次性解决原则、诚实信用原则和程序保障等原则。From the debate on the object of action,it can be found that the traditional new theory and old theory have distinct characteristics of conceptual jurisprudence,while the relative theory has a clear tendency towards topical jurisprudence.Conceptual jurisprudence emphasizes the external system while neglecting value issues,and topical jurisprudence focuses on values while ignoring the binding force of legal norms and the significance of the legal system.In contrast,the current mainstream evaluative jurisprudence,by advocating value-oriented thinking and the construction of an internal system,can be dedicated to just adjudication and a just legal order.Therefore,in the methodological approach of civil procedure law,evaluative jurisprudence should be adhered to,so as to properly handle the external system to achieve the unity and coordination of legal concepts and rules,and at the same time properly handle the internal system to achieve the appropriateness at the value level.Thus,in the issue of the object of action,on the one hand,it is necessary to distinguish between conceptual and functional object of action,and to supplement this with the construction of rules such as consolidation of claims and issue preclusion;on the other hand,it is necessary to implement the principle of one-time resolution of disputes,the principle of good faith,and the principle of procedural guarantees.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.141.157