大数据侦查与个人信息保护之间的冲突与规制  

Conflicts and Regulations Between Big Data Investigation and Personal Information Protection

作　　者：张宇航 ZHANG Yuhang

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期43-54,共12页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络时代新型侵财行为的入罪理念与方法研究”(19BFX075);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目“数字经济安全刑事法律风险防范研究”(2242024S30050)。

摘　　要：从传统侦查到大数据侦查,刑事侦查活动对公民个人信息权利的干预不断加深,给个人信息安全带来了极大风险,公权力与个人权利之间的冲突日趋尖锐。具体表现为侦查程序规制不足、刑事诉讼中个人信息权利不明确、权利救济通道不畅以及侦查程序规制不足。为有效应对这一挑战,应以比例原则、信息区分原则为指导,采取权力规制与权利保障双向路径。在建立大数据侦查行为的程序规制体系的同时,参考《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》的原则和精神,构建完善的大数据侦查规则体系,通过合理规制与保障措施维护个人信息安全,实现侦查效率与公民信息权利保护的平衡。The transition from traditional investigation to big data investigation has intensified the intrusion into citizenspersonal information rights,posing significant risks to personal information security and exacerbating the conflict between public authority and individual rights.This is evident in the insufficient regulation of investigative procedures,the lack of clarity regarding personal information rights in criminal proceedings,limited channels for rights relief,and inadequate regulatory measures for investigative processes.To effectively address this challenge,it is important to be guided by the principles of proportionality and information differentiation,and to adopt a dual approach of power regulation and rights protection.While establishing a procedural regulatory system for big data investigation actions,it is also essential to refer to the principles and spirit of Personal Information Protection Law of the Peoples Republic of China to build a comprehensive system of rules for big data investigation.This will help to maintain personal information security through reasonable regulatory and protective measures,achieving a balance between investigation efficiency and the protection of citizensinformation rights.

关 键 词：大数据侦查 个人信息保护 程序规制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]