检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高静[1] GAO Jing(School of Foreign Studies,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]南京大学
出 处:《外国语言文学》2025年第1期124-132,136,共10页Foreign Language and Literature Studies
基 金:国家语委“十四五”科研规划2022年度重大项目“新文科背景下的语言学学科建设研究”(ZDA145-7)子课题——“中国语言学自主知识体系构建研究”。
摘 要:伦理兼具“语境制约”和“语用资源”双重属性,在交际互动中发挥着重要作用。然而,相较于伦理作为语境制约的共识,其充当语用资源的创见尚待深掘。因此,本文基于“语用资源”的定义和特征,进一步论述伦理作为语用资源的理据、表现及其为语用实践带来的启示。本文对交际互动中伦理的资源属性的阐发带有建构主义色彩,是对传统本质主义伦理观的辩证补充,可以为当代语用学研究跨学科概念的引入和社会文化语用现象的解读提供新的思路。Ethics,with its dual attributes of“contextual constraint”and“pragmatic resource”,plays a vital role in communicative interactions.However,compared with the consensus of ethics as contextual constraint,the original idea of ethics as a pragmatic resource has yet to be profoundly explored.Therefore,based on the definition and characteristics of“pragmatic resource”,this paper further expounds on the rationale and representation of ethics as pragmatic resource and its implications for pragmatic practice.The interpretation of the resource attribute of ethics in communicative interaction presented in this paper is tinged with constructivism,which serves as a dialectical supplement to the conventional essentialist view of ethics.This paper might provide innovative ideas for the introduction of interdisciplinary concepts in contemporary pragmatics research and the interpretation of socio-cultural pragmatic phenomena。
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.59.149